The Wilson Pro Staff tennis racquets have been used by professional and advanced level tennis players for decades.
Below, I am going to review the latest version of the Wilson Pro Staff to help you decide if it is the right tennis racquet for your game.
First, you’ll see the different models of the Wilson Pro Staff. Then, I’ll discuss the on-court performance of the racquet, including the type of tennis player that should choose the Pro Staff.
When you buy a product through our links below, we may earn money from our affiliate partners to help support the site. Learn more here.
In the video below, I review 4 versions of the Wilson Pro Staff racquets.
The Wilson Pro Staff racquet comes in different versions that vary in weight, and a few other specifications.
Below is a list of the different Wilson Pro Staff tennis racquets available.
The most popular model is the Pro Staff 97 v13. Here are the specifications for this racquet.
Weight: 11.7 oz. strung
Head Size: 97 square inches
Length: 27 inches
Balance: 320 mm
String Pattern: 16×19
This is a relatively heavy tennis racquet, built for control and feel. The 16×19 string pattern allows you to generate plenty of spin on your groundstrokes, or slice on your backhand like Federer himself.
The beam width is narrower than many modern racquets which helps with control. Wilson’s carbon technology enhances the feel and comfort of this racquet as well.
The three other Pro Staff versions differ in weight. Here are the specifications for the Pro Staff RF97, Pro Staff 97L, and Pro Staff 97UL.
Pro Staff RF97
Pro Staff 97L
Pro Staff 97UL
Below, I’ll show you how the Pro Staff performs on the court, including how it compares to other tennis racquets.
When compared with some of the other best tennis racquets for advanced players, the Pro Staff has fantastic control. The racquet’s narrow frame and smaller head size allow you to move the ball around the court with precision.
Singles players will find that their groundstrokes, volleys, and returns are more accurate with the Pro Staff. With the open 16×19 string pattern, you can still create good spin as well.
Doubles players will love the control, feel, and touch from the Pro Staff. You’ll be able to hit more accurate volleys and better drop shots too.
Because the Pro Staff is slightly heavier than most other racquets on the market today, it is a more stable option.
The technology behind the frame helps with the stability as well. This means that any shots that you hit off-center won’t have that shock feedback that often comes with more power-focused racquets. The stability also helps the ball stay in the court.
The Pro Staff is great for fast paced tennis. Advanced players will be able to control and redirect hard hit balls with a solid, stable feel. Also, this racquet has great maneuverability for such a heavy frame. It is easy to handle around the net.
On returns and volleys, the Pro Staff is very forgiving. Even on slight mishits, the racquet head will still get through the ball.
The Pro Staff is definitely a racquet for players who can generate their own power. Groundstroke depth and serve power do not come easy with the Pro Staff.
Advanced players who play very fast-paced tennis, and hit the ball hard, will like the Pro Staff for its combination of control, stability, and comfort.
Intermediate players who have good hand-eye coordination and are relatively strong/athletic might consider the Pro Staff 97L.
For beginners, I’d recommend choosing a different Wilson racquet. Read our Wilson Clash review or Wilson Ultra review for two great choices.
I played with the Wilson Pro Staff 97 v13 for several practice sessions and competitive tennis matches. When hitting with the Wilson Pro Staff, I noticed two things very quickly.
I was able to place the ball nearly anywhere I wanted on the court. The racquet felt so comfortable on contact with great feel, it seemed like I could redirect and move the tennis ball and my opponent around with ease.
My drop shots and short angles were extremely accurate compared to my normal play (I typically use the Head Graphene 360 Speed Pro).
The second thing I noticed was how stable the Wilson Pro Staff was.
I had no issues volleying hard hit groundstrokes. Even when I made contact slightly off-center, the ball still managed to go in with decent accuracy.
Half volleys around the net were particularly easy with the Pro Staff. It felt like I just had to get the racquet in the way of the ball, and it would do all the work. The ball stayed low over the net, allowing me to transition to offense quickly.
Returning against big servers was also a nice bonus. I could stretch out on my backhand or forehand side and still hit a solid return back to the opponent. Again, even slight mishits were getting over the net and staying in the court.
The stability made defending hard hit balls much easier. The Pro Staff allowed me to stay in the point and transition to the net with ease.
The only drawback to playing with this racquet was the lack of power.
I did not easily hit the ball with depth on my groundstrokes, and my serve was definitely slower than normal.
I was playing mostly doubles, so I tried to get to the net as quickly as possible, where this racquet excelled.
After testing and reviewing the Wilson Pro Staff, I’d recommend it for high-level intermediate to advanced players who can easily create their own power.
If I were to stick with the Pro Staff, I think I would love it for the 3 games I’m not serving (in doubles). However, since I don’t generate much natural power on my serve, I struggled to get free points from missed returns.
Get A Free Net-Play Doubles Guide on How to Play with More Confidence at the Net! Join league and tournament doubles players from all over the world and improve your game with a new doubles lesson each week.
Will Boucek is the Founder & CEO of The Tennis Tribe. He has played tennis for over two decades, including in college. Will has worked with ATP & WTA tour players and coaches. He currently lives in Austin TX where he plays USTA leagues & tournaments, writes about tennis, and teaches doubles workshops.